We use this term to describe a game design philosophy where meaningful progression and access to core content are achievable through gameplay, skill, and time investment, without being unreasonably slow or difficult compared to paying. It signifies a level playing field where player dedication is the primary driver of advancement.

Not necessarily. We cover free-to-play games that may have monetization, such as cosmetic item shops, optional battle passes, or "supporter packs." The crucial distinction is that this monetization does not create a significant power advantage or lock essential gameplay content, story, or features behind a paywall, allowing for a paywall-free core experience.

Our process involves significant hands-on playtime across different aspects of a game (PvE, PvP, economy, etc.). We track progression rates, engage with systems as non-paying players, and monitor how updates affect accessibility. We also research developer statements and patch notes, and consider widespread community feedback from forums and social media.

Absolutely not. We believe developers deserve to be compensated for their work. We support ethical monetization models that fund ongoing development without compromising the core game experience for non-paying players. Examples include selling cosmetic items, convenience features that don't affect power, or voluntary supporter benefits.

We cannot offer guarantees, as game developers may change their business models with updates. However, we focus on games with a strong track record of fair practices and transparent developer communication. We also update our reviews and articles if a game's fundamental approach shifts away from a fair balance.